How would he prove it ?

General discussion about computer chess...
Post Reply
User avatar
Ted Summers
Posts: 148
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:49 am
Real Name: Ted Summers
Location: Marietta, GA (USA)
Contact:

How would he prove it ?

Post by Ted Summers » Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:55 pm

"You have the R3 release source code, while Vas does not have it"
http://talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 48&t=34931

If Osipov Jury had the source code that Vas said he lost, How would Vas prove it was his? :D
"Good decisions come from experience, and experience comes from bad decisions."

CarstenL
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:23 am

Re: How would he prove it ?

Post by CarstenL » Tue Jun 15, 2010 5:02 pm

Ted Summers wrote:"You have the R3 release source code, while Vas does not have it"
http://talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 48&t=34931
....
from that link:
Osipov Jury wrote:
Probably the only way to put an end to these disputes - to publish the source code of Rybka 3. In the end, I'll do it.

:shock: :shock: :shock:

User avatar
notyetagm
Posts: 139
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 6:12 pm

Re: How would he prove it ?

Post by notyetagm » Tue Jun 15, 2010 7:31 pm

Vas should release the emails that he said the "cloners" sent him while they were in the process of RE'ing Rybka 3. Vas said that they sent him an email telling him what they were doing and also sent additional emails detailing their progress.

I would believe him if he released even one authentic email. His failure to release even a single email is the main reason I do not believe his claim. I mean, how hard would it be to publish an email on his website???

Someone please correct me if I am wrong; that is, if Vas having these cloner emails is simply an urban legend.

Post Reply