Firstly, the rules are here:
https://github.com/TheYoBots/libot-lb#rules in case you want to read them (I dont think so since you probably dont care)
Secondly, farming does not depend in the number of games you have played but in the opponents you face during those games and the strength / elo they have compared to your BOT.
What are you going to report to Lichess? That I removed you from an unofficial list made for fun to make a Lichess BOT ranking? Are you serious, really? What have I done against you in order to get reported? Come on.
By the way, why are you mentioning the number of blitz games continuously when I did not even mention it?
The point is not the number of weak engines you can play or not, the point is that you only / mostly played against weak engines,. That is what I have always been saying during this conversation.
I understand that it may have been frustrating for you to win a game and not get elo (it also happens to me and to every BOT owner). We already talked about this in the Goi's forum, I dont know why that happens (maybe it is the Glicko2 rating system) but that is how Lichess works. The thing I still dont understand is that because of that you decide to only play against weak BOTs.
If I had to say you did not play fair, it would specially be in bullet:
- For example with this account:
https://lichess.org/@/LermerBot
Out of 73 bullet games you played, you won 71:
- 30 of them, against @SaxtonEngine, which has 600 elo less than your BOT
- 20 of them, against @TuksuBot, which also has 600-650 elo less than your BOT
- 17 of them, against @pawn_git, which also has 550-600 elo less than your BOT
- 3 of them, against @blundar_bot, which is probably fine, since the elo difference is not too big (200-250 elo diff) but is not an strong BOT either
So, in sum, out of 71 wins in bullet, 67 of them (94,36%) where against BOTs with 550-600 elo less than your BOT.
- With this other account:
https://lichess.org/@/EdoBot
Out of 213 bullet games you played, you won 187:
- 56 of them (29% of the won games), against @SaxtonEngine, which has 550-600 elo less than your BOT
- 17 of them, against @TuksuBot, which has 600 elo less than your BOT
- 51 of them (27,27% of the won games) against @admete_bot, which has 600 elo less than your BOT
- 22 of them against @pawn_git, which has 550-600 elo less than your BOT
- 14 of them against @blundar_bot, which as I said is probably fine (200-250 elo diff) but it is not an strong BOT either
- 4 of them against @expositor, which has 400 elo less than your BOT
- 6 of them against @catriever, which has 500 elo less than your BOT
- 10 of them against @AKS-Mantissa, which has 500 elo less than your BOT
So, in sum, out of 187 wins in bullet, 166 (88,77%) were against BOTs with mostly 500-600 elo less than your BOT.
Do you really think that this is fair? Is that really "being more successful"?
Please, be honest.
Because they are your first games you have to play only against weak BOTs or what? I dont understand your point.