Correspondence GM ?

General discussion about computer chess...
User avatar
Dr.Wael Deeb
Posts: 104
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 8:29 pm
Real Name: Dr.Wael Deeb

Re: Correspondence GM ?

Post by Dr.Wael Deeb » Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:18 pm

Dr. Ivannik wrote:Gentlemen

I remember the good old days when a correspondence chess player's tools where his chess books and notes. Is the use of engines allowed in today's correspondence tournaments???
Dr Ivannik
Of course they are 8-)
Cheers,
Dr.D

Hood
Posts: 200
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 2:36 pm
Real Name: Krzych C.

Re: Correspondence GM ?

Post by Hood » Tue Sep 14, 2010 10:27 am

Dr. Ivannik wrote:Gentlemen

I remember the good old days when a correspondence chess player's tools where his chess books and notes. Is the use of engines allowed in today's correspondence tournaments???

Dr Ivannik
I remember thouse good days , too :-) but the things has changed :-( .
So there is need for other preparation. Books, databases are on the computer disk.

Rgds Hood
Smolensk 2010. Murder or accident... Cui bono ?

There are not bugs free programms. There are programms with undiscovered bugs.
Alleluia.

jim uselton
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 3:13 am

Re: Correspondence GM ?

Post by jim uselton » Fri Oct 08, 2010 8:15 am

Lets say a guy is a 1500 player but is pretty good with computers. His computer is 2yrs old---Dell inspiron 531. He downloads Stockfish 1.9---voila---he is now a grandmaster! Can he not beat any GM in the world? Just curious! How would he do in a 10 game match with Anand or Topalov? :lol:

User avatar
Uly
Posts: 838
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 5:33 am

Re: Correspondence GM ?

Post by Uly » Fri Oct 08, 2010 10:11 am

jim uselton wrote:Can he not beat any GM in the world? Just curious! How would he do in a 10 game match with Anand or Topalov? :lol:
Yeah, but the thread is talking about a Correspondence GM, and yeah, some guy with old hardware could have analysis methods with Stockfish 1.9 that allow him to beat people with worse analysis methods even if they're running high end hardware with better engines, giving him the chance to become Correspondence GM, but it's definitively not going to be about sitting in front of the computer to watch Stockfish reaching high depth, it's going to take a lot of work, and the slower the hardware the higher the effort that he needs.

Hood
Posts: 200
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 2:36 pm
Real Name: Krzych C.

Re: Correspondence GM ?

Post by Hood » Sat Oct 23, 2010 10:08 am

Are we able to have any conclusions ?

a) analysis methods -> what GUIs neccessary
b) hardware -> minimal reasonable
c) software -> engines

rgds Hood
Smolensk 2010. Murder or accident... Cui bono ?

There are not bugs free programms. There are programms with undiscovered bugs.
Alleluia.

Dayffd
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 2:46 pm

Re: Correspondence GM ?

Post by Dayffd » Sun Oct 31, 2010 3:12 pm

Hood wrote:Are we able to have any conclusions ?

a) analysis methods -> what GUIs neccessary
b) hardware -> minimal reasonable
c) software -> engines

rgds Hood
There is only one thing missing. I used to play correspondence chess until the engines came into play. I have all of the engines; if I want to play against an engine, why would I spend the time and money to play correspondence chess? I can play against chess engines at home on my computers. I prefer to pay against people which means correspondence chess is out and otb chess is the only avenue available now.

Hood
Posts: 200
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 2:36 pm
Real Name: Krzych C.

Re: Correspondence GM ?

Post by Hood » Sun Oct 31, 2010 8:03 pm

The factor of the computer analysis is about 70-80 % but the human has own input in the game.
Smolensk 2010. Murder or accident... Cui bono ?

There are not bugs free programms. There are programms with undiscovered bugs.
Alleluia.

Post Reply