Let's go!

Correspondence games between OpenChess members here...

Re: Let's go!

Postby Ted Summers » Fri Jun 18, 2010 10:35 am

[Event "OpenChess"]
[Site "open-chess.org"]
[Date "2010.06.12"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Ted Summers"]
[Black "Jeremy Bernstein"]
[Result "*"]
[ECO "B10"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. 0-0 Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. c3 0-0 9. h3 Bb7 10. d4 Na5 11. Bc2 Nc4 12. Nbd2 exd4 13. cxd4 d5 14. e5 Nxd2 15. exf6 Nxf3+ 16. Qxf3 Bxf6 17. Bf4 Re8 18. Qc3 Re7 19. Rxe7 Bxe7 20. Re1 b4 21. Qe3 Kf8 22. Bxh7 c5 23. Qg3 Qa5 24. Bh6 b3 25. Qxg7+ Ke8 26. Qf8+ Kd7 27. Bf5+
"Good decisions come from experience, and experience comes from bad decisions."
User avatar
Ted Summers
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:49 am
Location: Marietta, GA (USA)

Re: Let's go!

Postby Jeremy Bernstein » Fri Jun 18, 2010 10:40 am

[Event "OpenChess"]
[Site "open-chess.org"]
[Date "2010.06.12"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Ted Summers"]
[Black "Jeremy Bernstein"]
[Result "*"]
[ECO "B10"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. 0-0 Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. c3 0-0 9. h3 Bb7 10. d4 Na5 11. Bc2 Nc4 12. Nbd2 exd4 13. cxd4 d5 14. e5 Nxd2 15. exf6 Nxf3+ 16. Qxf3 Bxf6 17. Bf4 Re8 18. Qc3 Re7 19. Rxe7 Bxe7 20. Re1 b4 21. Qe3 Kf8 22. Bxh7 c5 23. Qg3 Qa5 24. Bh6 b3 25. Qxg7+ Ke8 26. Qf8+ Kd7 27. Bf5+ Kc6
Jeremy Bernstein
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1225
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 7:49 am
Location: Berlin, Germany

Re: Let's go!

Postby Ted Summers » Fri Jun 18, 2010 10:42 am

[Event "OpenChess"]
[Site "open-chess.org"]
[Date "2010.06.12"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Ted Summers"]
[Black "Jeremy Bernstein"]
[Result "*"]
[ECO "B10"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. 0-0 Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. c3 0-0 9. h3 Bb7 10. d4 Na5 11. Bc2 Nc4 12. Nbd2 exd4 13. cxd4 d5 14. e5 Nxd2 15. exf6 Nxf3+ 16. Qxf3 Bxf6 17. Bf4 Re8 18. Qc3 Re7 19. Rxe7 Bxe7 20. Re1 b4 21. Qe3 Kf8 22. Bxh7 c5 23. Qg3 Qa5 24. Bh6 b3 25. Qxg7+ Ke8 26. Qf8+ Kd7 27. Bf5+ Kc6 28. Qxe7
"Good decisions come from experience, and experience comes from bad decisions."
User avatar
Ted Summers
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:49 am
Location: Marietta, GA (USA)

Re: Let's go!

Postby Jeremy Bernstein » Sat Jun 19, 2010 8:02 am

Damn, did I miscalculate. Wish I had done 24. ...Qd8 instead. I'm off to Greece for a week, will check in on this game when I have internet access...

[Event "OpenChess"]
[Site "open-chess.org"]
[Date "2010.06.12"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Ted Summers"]
[Black "Jeremy Bernstein"]
[Result "*"]
[ECO "B10"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. 0-0 Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. c3 0-0 9. h3 Bb7 10. d4 Na5 11. Bc2 Nc4 12. Nbd2 exd4 13. cxd4 d5 14. e5 Nxd2 15. exf6 Nxf3+ 16. Qxf3 Bxf6 17. Bf4 Re8 18. Qc3 Re7 19. Rxe7 Bxe7 20. Re1 b4 21. Qe3 Kf8 22. Bxh7 c5 23. Qg3 Qa5 24. Bh6 b3 25. Qxg7+ Ke8 26. Qf8+ Kd7 27. Bf5+ Kc6 28. Qxe7 Qxe1
Jeremy Bernstein
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1225
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 7:49 am
Location: Berlin, Germany

Re: Let's go!

Postby Ted Summers » Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:52 am

Jeremy Bernstein wrote:Damn, did I miscalculate. Wish I had done 24. ...Qd8 instead. I'm off to Greece for a week, will check in on this game when I have internet access...


r2q4/1b2Qp2/p1k4B/2pp1B2/3P4/1p5P/PP3PP1/4R1K1 w - - 1 29

If you had that would lose to 29. Qxc5#
"Good decisions come from experience, and experience comes from bad decisions."
User avatar
Ted Summers
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:49 am
Location: Marietta, GA (USA)

Re: Let's go!

Postby Ted Summers » Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:57 am

[Event "OpenChess"]
[Site "open-chess.org"]
[Date "2010.06.12"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Ted Summers"]
[Black "Jeremy Bernstein"]
[Result "*"]
[ECO "B10"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. 0-0 Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. c3 0-0 9. h3 Bb7 10. d4 Na5 11. Bc2 Nc4 12. Nbd2 exd4 13. cxd4 d5 14. e5 Nxd2 15. exf6 Nxf3+ 16. Qxf3 Bxf6 17. Bf4 Re8 18. Qc3 Re7 19. Rxe7 Bxe7 20. Re1 b4 21. Qe3 Kf8 22. Bxh7 c5 23. Qg3 Qa5 24. Bh6 b3 25. Qxg7+ Ke8 26. Qf8+ Kd7 27. Bf5+ Kc6 28. Qxe7 Qxe1 29. Qxe1
"Good decisions come from experience, and experience comes from bad decisions."
User avatar
Ted Summers
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:49 am
Location: Marietta, GA (USA)

Re: Let's go!

Postby Sentinel » Sat Jun 19, 2010 5:28 pm

Jeremy Bernstein wrote:Damn, did I miscalculate. Wish I had done 24. ...Qd8 instead. I'm off to Greece for a week, will check in on this game when I have internet access...

Why not resign instead, this is lost even against sub 1000 elo player ;).
Sentinel
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:49 am

Re: Let's go!

Postby Ted Summers » Sat Jun 19, 2010 6:28 pm

Sentinel wrote:
Jeremy Bernstein wrote:Damn, did I miscalculate. Wish I had done 24. ...Qd8 instead. I'm off to Greece for a week, will check in on this game when I have internet access...

Why not resign instead, this is lost even against sub 1000 elo player ;).


I would not be so sure a 1000 elo rated player or lower could win this, those are the kind of odds I bet you could give to a 1000 elo player or lower and win maybe 50% of the time if not more. 8-)
"Good decisions come from experience, and experience comes from bad decisions."
User avatar
Ted Summers
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:49 am
Location: Marietta, GA (USA)

Re: Let's go!

Postby Sentinel » Sat Jun 19, 2010 6:50 pm

Ted Summers wrote:I would not be so sure a 1000 elo rated player or lower could win this, those are the kind of odds I bet you could give to a 1000 elo player or lower and win maybe 50% of the time if not more. 8-)

I would say 1000 elo is good estimate where a player with queen odd would always win.
I'm maybe 1300-1400 elo, and I can't say with significance that in the current position the mate is in 9 (as engines can), but I'm pretty sure it's very close.

Edit: In game where rating of players is at least 1200elo, IMO only fair thing to do with a queen down is to resign.
Sentinel
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:49 am

Re: Let's go!

Postby Ted Summers » Sat Jun 19, 2010 7:15 pm

Sentinel wrote:
Ted Summers wrote:I would not be so sure a 1000 elo rated player or lower could win this, those are the kind of odds I bet you could give to a 1000 elo player or lower and win maybe 50% of the time if not more. 8-)

I would say 1000 elo is good estimate where a player with queen odd would always win.
I'm maybe 1300-1400 elo, and I can't say with significance that in the current position the mate is in 9 (as engines can), but I'm pretty sure it's very close.

Edit: In game where rating of players is at least 1200elo, IMO only fair thing to do with a queen down is to resign.


It would be interesting to see what kind of odds could be given to a 1000 elo or lower player. I guess the higher your rating the more odds you can give.
"Good decisions come from experience, and experience comes from bad decisions."
User avatar
Ted Summers
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:49 am
Location: Marietta, GA (USA)

PreviousNext

Return to Correspondence Games

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron