![difus_27.gif :difus_27](./images/smilies/difus_27.gif)
Ramz Tours & TESTS
-
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2023 12:28 am
- Real Name: Fringe
Re: Ramz Tours & TESTS
Wow! Congratulations ![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
Re: Ramz Tours & TESTS
Thanks too Homayoun
Congratulations indeed to Team JaR Heads dear Fringe![😉](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/emojione/assets/3.1/png/64/1f609.png)
Congratulations indeed to Team JaR Heads dear Fringe
![😉](http://cdn.jsdelivr.net/emojione/assets/3.1/png/64/1f609.png)
Re: Ramz Tours & TESTS
Code: Select all
Tc:1m+1s
openings: UHO_2022_8mvs_+170_+179.pgn
Score of Marauders 3.0_avx2 vs Stockfish 240322_avx2: 34 - 27 - 89 [0.523]
... Marauders 3.0_avx2 playing White: 32 - 0 - 43 [0.713] 75
... Marauders 3.0_avx2 playing Black: 2 - 27 - 46 [0.333] 75
... White vs Black: 59 - 2 - 89 [0.690] 150
Elo difference: 16.2 +/- 35.5, LOS: 81.5 %, DrawRatio: 59.3 %
150 of 150 games finished.
https://pixeldrain.com/u/3EawEgfe
Re: Ramz Tours & TESTS
![Image](https://i.postimg.cc/cHwds0Vb/Tactica-L-Gear-3-1-avx2.png)
![Image](https://i.postimg.cc/5t9zYkxg/image.png)
Openings: UHO_2022_8mvs_+170_+179.pgn
TC: 1m + 1s
Default Engine settings
games
https://pixeldrain.com/u/AcNakrwx
-
- Posts: 1281
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 6:29 am
Re: Ramz Tours & TESTS
OrgZ wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2024 6:19 amgamesCode: Select all
Tc:1m+1s openings: UHO_2022_8mvs_+170_+179.pgn Score of Marauders 3.0_avx2 vs Stockfish 240322_avx2: 34 - 27 - 89 [0.523] ... Marauders 3.0_avx2 playing White: 32 - 0 - 43 [0.713] 75 ... Marauders 3.0_avx2 playing Black: 2 - 27 - 46 [0.333] 75 ... White vs Black: 59 - 2 - 89 [0.690] 150 Elo difference: 16.2 +/- 35.5, LOS: 81.5 %, DrawRatio: 59.3 % 150 of 150 games finished.
https://pixeldrain.com/u/3EawEgfe
Thanks a lot and congrats
![difus_19.gif :difus_19](./images/smilies/difus_19.gif)
A new idea is born,
I plan to repeat the same test... but at least several times..
So let's see what will be situation...who will win each time ?)
So...
Can you share please your used same UHO opening suite..
Thanks in advance
Re: Ramz Tours & TESTS
Currently testing MANDASedat Canbaz wrote: ↑Wed Mar 27, 2024 7:48 pmOrgZ wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2024 6:19 amgamesCode: Select all
Tc:1m+1s openings: UHO_2022_8mvs_+170_+179.pgn Score of Marauders 3.0_avx2 vs Stockfish 240322_avx2: 34 - 27 - 89 [0.523] ... Marauders 3.0_avx2 playing White: 32 - 0 - 43 [0.713] 75 ... Marauders 3.0_avx2 playing Black: 2 - 27 - 46 [0.333] 75 ... White vs Black: 59 - 2 - 89 [0.690] 150 Elo difference: 16.2 +/- 35.5, LOS: 81.5 %, DrawRatio: 59.3 % 150 of 150 games finished.
https://pixeldrain.com/u/3EawEgfe
Thanks a lot and congrats![]()
A new idea is born,
I plan to repeat the same test... but at least several times..
So let's see what will be situation...who will win each time ?)
So...
Can you share please your used same UHO opening suite..
Thanks in advance
![Image](https://i.postimg.cc/PJK9TsHc/Whats-App-Image-2024-03-27-at-9-05-30-PM.jpg)
Code: Select all
Score of MANDA 1 vs MANDA 2: 25 - 27 - 73 [0.492]
... MANDA 1 playing White: 25 - 3 - 34 [0.677] 62
... MANDA 1 playing Black: 0 - 24 - 39 [0.310] 63
... White vs Black: 49 - 3 - 73 [0.684] 125
Elo difference: -5.6 +/- 39.4, LOS: 39.1 %, DrawRatio: 58.4 %
125 of 150 games finished.
My cutechess settings
Depth: 13 plies
8 concurrent games
UHO_2022_8mvs_+170_+179.pgn
https://pixeldrain.com/u/Bx4KaYtK
-
- Posts: 1281
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 6:29 am
Re: Ramz Tours & TESTS
Dear Sedat great idea!
My cutechess settings
Depth: 13 plies
8 concurrent games
UHO_2022_8mvs_+170_+179.pgn
https://pixeldrain.com/u/Bx4KaYtK
[/quote]
Dear Tanick,
Thanks again....
Yes.. the idea is not so so bad... )
But at least I can say,
The planning new test is never seen before for sure )
But you know, my tours, testings do not looks to others..
I wonder really...and in my opinion is lottery to see, to determine
the real Elo difference.. if two Top engines and close in strength...
Sure I mean if running via UHO and just 150 games (per player)
But anyhow, after all,
Time will tell about who will win each time.. right ? )
Btw, after quick checking...(your previous test)
I noticed very bad games..just one example,
Which is ended in 12 moves....and the other game
Also ended in 12 moves.. I mean same opening as twice..
What I can say more,
FUN is important....at least the openings should be at least
A little bit more serious... otherwise...what a pitty that,
I can not say a FUN.. just of waste of time...
And let's hope to see, to appear less similar games ))
But via UHO openings... no any guarantee..right ?? ))
Greetings
My cutechess settings
Depth: 13 plies
8 concurrent games
UHO_2022_8mvs_+170_+179.pgn
https://pixeldrain.com/u/Bx4KaYtK
[/quote]
Dear Tanick,
Thanks again....
Yes.. the idea is not so so bad... )
But at least I can say,
The planning new test is never seen before for sure )
But you know, my tours, testings do not looks to others..
I wonder really...and in my opinion is lottery to see, to determine
the real Elo difference.. if two Top engines and close in strength...
Sure I mean if running via UHO and just 150 games (per player)
But anyhow, after all,
Time will tell about who will win each time.. right ? )
Btw, after quick checking...(your previous test)
I noticed very bad games..just one example,
Which is ended in 12 moves....and the other game
Also ended in 12 moves.. I mean same opening as twice..
Code: Select all
[Event "My Tournament"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2024.03.24"]
[Round "66"]
[White "Stockfish 240322_avx2"]
[Black "Marauders 3.0_avx2"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "A10"]
[PlyCount "24"]
[EventDate "2024.??.??"]
[TimeControl "60+1"]
1. c4 {book} d6 {book} 2. d4 {book} f5 {book} 3. Nc3 {book} Nf6 {book} 4. Bg5 {
book} g6 {book} 5. Bxf6 {book} exf6 {book} 6. e3 {book} Bg7 {book} 7. Bd3 {book
} f4 {-1.62/19 4.2s} 8. exf4 {+1.89/19 3.7s} f5 {-1.83/20 4.3s} 9. Nf3 {
+1.91/19 2.3s} O-O {-1.90/19 4.7s} 10. h4 {+2.05/17 1.4s} c5 {-1.82/19 7.0s}
11. d5 {+1.77/20 5.3s} Re8+ {-1.82/19 5.1s} 12. Kf1 {+1.82/19 2.1s} h5 {
-1.82/19 3.0s, White wins by adjudication} 1-0
FUN is important....at least the openings should be at least
A little bit more serious... otherwise...what a pitty that,
I can not say a FUN.. just of waste of time...
And let's hope to see, to appear less similar games ))
But via UHO openings... no any guarantee..right ?? ))
Greetings