Thanks. This list contains all the intresting engines. I like that the time per move is fixed in your games to exclude potentially bad and buggy time management. So only the pure 'analytical strength' is tested that is also the most important part of the 'playing strength'.
Interesting is that the strength of Houdini is not as high as my "Comparison Houdini - IvanHoe - Stockfish" suggests. This is an example that testing against a lot of opponents is important for estimating the real strength.
New Rating List
-
gaard
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:39 am
- Real Name: Martin Wyngaarden
- Location: Holland, Michigan
Re: New Rating List
Testing of Houdini 1.03 complete. Now testing IvanHoe 999952a with TripleBases.
Code: Select all
Rank Name Elo + - games score oppo. draws
1 Houdini 1.03 129 17 17 1081 73% -37 35%
2 Rybka 4 116 16 16 1193 69% -23 33%
3 Houdini 1.02 104 21 21 674 69% -35 38%
4 IvanHoe999952a 104 148 137 12 67% 8 50%
5 IvanHoe 9.57a 102 17 16 1133 68% -28 38%
6 Stockfish 1.8 55 16 16 1174 60% -19 35%
7 Naum 4.2 -3 16 16 1144 52% -16 36%
8 Shredder 12 32-bit -57 16 16 1134 43% -11 32%
9 Critter 0.70 -73 16 16 1145 41% -8 32%
10 Spark 0.4 -134 17 17 1136 32% -3 30%
11 Zappa Mexico II -146 17 17 1173 30% 2 31%
12 Toga II 1.4beta5c -197 17 18 1173 24% 7 26%
-
gaard
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:39 am
- Real Name: Martin Wyngaarden
- Location: Holland, Michigan
Re: New Rating List
More games to come for IvanHoe 9.52a, but so far it looks like a regression from 9.57a. If the rating does not pick up in the next 60 games, I will stop testing and move on to Critter 0.80.
Code: Select all
Rank Name Elo + - games score oppo. draws
1 Houdini 1.03 133 17 17 1117 72% -31 36%
2 Rybka 4 116 16 16 1226 68% -17 34%
3 Houdini 1.02 106 21 21 674 69% -33 38%
4 IvanHoe 9.57a 104 17 16 1133 68% -25 38%
5 IvanHoe999952a 76 35 34 225 58% 14 42%
6 Stockfish 1.8 59 16 16 1207 60% -14 35%
7 Naum 4.2 -1 16 16 1180 51% -10 37%
8 Shredder 12 32-bit -55 16 16 1134 43% -8 32%
9 Critter 0.70 -69 16 16 1182 40% -3 32%
10 Spark 0.4 -130 16 17 1174 32% 2 29%
11 Zappa Mexico II -144 17 17 1173 30% 5 31%
12 Toga II 1.4beta5c -194 17 18 1173 24% 10 26%
-
gaard
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:39 am
- Real Name: Martin Wyngaarden
- Location: Holland, Michigan
Re: New Rating List
With my other list mostly complete, I thought I'd start one for determining performance in endgames. I've done this before but with 40/4 time controls and not the fixed time control that I now use for testing. My positions are also a little better as well though I sure they can still be improved. Here are positions I am using for endgames and here are the ratings so far:
Notice the compressed ratings. I doubt I will play enough games under these conditions to demonstrate superiority of one engine over another, but I still though it would interesting. You'll also notice I mostly define endgame by the amount of material left on the board.
Code: Select all
Rank Name Elo + - games score oppo. draws
1 IvanHoe 9.52a 32 36 36 190 56% -1 71%
2 Rybka 4 27 34 34 219 56% -6 69%
3 Stockfish 1.8 24 32 32 258 55% -6 68%
4 Houdini 1.03a 18 36 36 193 53% 1 74%
5 Critter_0.80_64bit -6 36 36 193 47% 6 70%
6 Fruit 2.1 -96 39 39 191 30% 20 57%
1kb4r/p5R1/1p6/4p3/2PnB3/8/1P6/1K1N4 b - - 0 44 bm ;
3b2R1/3k4/p1p5/2p2P2/r1P5/4BK2/8/8 w - - 7 67 bm ;
4r1k1/1P6/8/2qn3p/Q7/KP2p1PP/8/3R4 w - - 0 57 bm ;
8/4kp2/6p1/2N1b1P1/1P2N3/5b1r/2RK4/8 w - - 0 48 bm ;
4k3/4b3/4p1P1/8/8/1P1R4/2P4P/r1K5 w - - 0 45 bm ;
8/4kp2/p3n2B/P2rP3/1pP3Pp/8/1P6/1R3K2 b - - 0 38 bm ;
8/6k1/3p4/3P3Q/1pq4P/pN4P1/8/6K1 w - - 1 50 bm ;
8/5pbk/p2B3p/q3Pbp1/8/5N1P/6P1/3Q2K1 w - - 0 44 bm ;
8/3R2kp/1p4p1/p1p5/P7/1P3N2/6P1/2q2BK1 b - - 0 42 bm ;
5k2/1p2b2p/4P1p1/5p2/8/1P1Q2P1/1q3P1P/5NK1 b - - 0 37 bm ;
8/pp3nbk/2p4p/2P1p1p1/1P2PpP1/2BN4/P4PPK/8 w - - 1 37 bm ;
3R4/6k1/5ppq/4p3/4PP2/1B6/1KP4P/8 w - - 1 68 bm ;
8/2p2pk1/1p4pp/1P1nP3/8/3n1N1P/4NPP1/6K1 w - - 0 34 bm ;
4b3/5p2/1k2p3/p1p1P2p/P1R1P2P/5P2/r1BK4/8 w - - 0 55 bm ;
7r/2p2pp1/2Bkp3/P6p/6nP/3P4/2P5/5R1K w - - 0 32 bm ;
7k/4n1p1/3RB2p/4N3/b7/2r4P/5PP1/6K1 b - - 0 34 bm ;
3Q1n1k/p4r1p/1p6/1P2p3/P7/6P1/5P2/6K1 b - - 0 58 bm ;
5r1k/pp3p2/2p4p/3p1Q2/8/2b4P/P5PK/8 w - - 0 32 bm ;
1R6/6p1/1pk4p/1n1p3r/2p2P2/4PP2/1R3K2/8 w - - 0 56 bm ;
8/3b4/2P1p1k1/4Qp2/1q3P2/5BK1/8/8 b - - 0 58 bm ;
2r5/4k3/4p3/2P4p/1PKbpN2/7P/8/2R5 b - - 0 64 bm ;
4q3/2b3kp/2Q5/1K6/1PB5/8/6P1/8 b - - 0 56 bm ;
1r6/1p2pk2/pBn4p/4p2p/8/8/PP3PPP/3R2K1 b - - 0 26 bm ;
5r1k/1p5p/pP6/4P3/6p1/6P1/1P6/R5K1 b - - 0 45 bm ;
2r3k1/p2n1p2/4pp1p/2N5/1p1P4/4PP2/1P4PP/2R3K1 b - - 0 30 bm ;
8/4k3/3p4/4p1p1/1P2Q1P1/q4P1P/8/5K2 w - - 0 56 bm ;
k7/5p2/2nrp3/1p6/4P3/1N3P1P/5RP1/7K b - - 0 40 bm ;
8/p2R1kp1/1p3p1p/b3p3/2r3PN/7P/PP3P2/6K1 b - - 0 34 bm ;
5k2/5rp1/3p2P1/p1p1p1K1/P1P1Pp2/1pP5/1P3P2/6R1 b - - 0 56 bm ;
8/1b1nN1k1/1b1p1pp1/3P4/1N4P1/n4P2/B5K1/4B3 b - - 0 62 bm ;
2r3k1/5pp1/p2P3p/b7/N7/1p1NPKP1/1P3P1P/8 w - - 0 34 bm ;
6k1/5pp1/4p3/4q3/8/8/5P1P/2Q3K1 w - - 0 39 bm ;
r2n1k2/6p1/1B3p1p/p3p3/B1b1P2P/R4P2/1P4PK/8 b - - 0 33 bm ;
2R5/1r4kp/p5p1/4Np2/8/1B5P/Pr4P1/7K w - - 0 38 bm ;
4r3/5p2/pkb3pp/4p3/1N2n1P1/8/PPP3BP/3R2K1 b - - 0 29 bm ;
8/2n1r3/2PN1kp1/pB6/PnR5/6Kp/7P/8 w - - 0 61 bm ;
1r6/6kp/p5pn/5p2/4bP2/P5PB/1P2RK1P/4N3 b - - 0 36 bm ;
8/4k1p1/r4p2/3p4/P2Np1P1/Rp6/1r2BK2/8 w - - 0 49 bm ;
2r3k1/5p1p/N5p1/3b4/r7/3P3P/1R4P1/3R3K w - - 0 31 bm ;
6kr/1p4p1/p7/4B2p/7P/8/2r1B1P1/4K2R w K - 0 30 bm ;
8/4rbk1/3b2p1/1p3p1p/3P4/5P1P/1PN2BP1/R5K1 w - - 0 38 bm ;
8/2k5/2n5/3pPp2/1p6/4BNK1/r1p5/7R w - - 0 53 bm ;
5k2/3b3p/5p2/3Pp1p1/p1R1P1P1/5PK1/r5P1/N7 w - - 0 43 bm ;
7k/6qp/R5p1/2rB4/3n3P/6P1/5PK1/8 w - - 0 50 bm ;
5k2/5pp1/7p/p1r2P1P/n2R2P1/5B2/2P2PK1/8 b - - 0 39 bm ;
4r3/1p5R/3p1pk1/3K4/pPP3r1/P7/8/7R w - - 0 41 bm ;
r4n2/6R1/p1pk4/3p2Pp/NP6/7P/2P2P2/6K1 b - - 0 34 bm ;
q5k1/5pp1/3p3p/7P/1PB1n3/2P5/3KQ1P1/8 w - - 0 42 bm ;
8/1b5k/6p1/3p1p1p/PK3P1P/3B2R1/6P1/2r5 b - - 0 41 bm ;
r5k1/pp2rppp/4p3/8/3P4/1P4P1/P4PKP/2R2R2 w - - 0 22 bm ;
6k1/5p1p/8/2r5/3N4/3r4/6PP/4R1K1 w - - 0 47 bm ;
1kb5/3r1p2/p6p/6p1/8/6P1/KP2R2P/5B2 w - - 0 35 bm ;
8/p3P3/2p2ppk/3r2p1/P5P1/6P1/5PK1/1R6 b - - 0 44 bm ;
8/6kp/8/3qp3/PR3n2/5P2/6PP/1R5K w - - 0 55 bm ;
8/B6p/2r1k3/1R3N2/1bP1p3/3n3P/7K/8 b - - 0 50 bm ;
3b4/1p5k/2n4p/pB3p2/PnP4p/5N2/1P3PP1/2B3K1 w - - 0 34 bm ;
2r4k/8/3B4/p4p1P/Pp6/8/1bP1R3/7K b - - 0 46 bm ;
8/4k3/8/p1p1P2p/2Pb3r/P2N4/3KR2P/8 w - - 0 41 bm ;
8/8/3nkppp/2B1p3/2n1P1P1/1b1BNP2/4K2P/8 w - - 0 37 bm ;
7k/6p1/5n1p/4pN2/8/P7/KPR4P/3r4 b - - 0 38 bm ;
Re: New Rating List
Hi gaard,
it would be interesting if you test Dr. Deeb's Firebird 1.1, see here http://www.open-chess.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=541#p4876
In Dr. Deeb's list it is more than 100ELO better than all other engines. I have my doubts, but since the differences are so big it would be worth to test this engine.
it would be interesting if you test Dr. Deeb's Firebird 1.1, see here http://www.open-chess.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=541#p4876
In Dr. Deeb's list it is more than 100ELO better than all other engines. I have my doubts, but since the differences are so big it would be worth to test this engine.
-
gaard
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:39 am
- Real Name: Martin Wyngaarden
- Location: Holland, Michigan
Re: New Rating List
I no longer have Firebird 1.1. Know where I can find it?TPJR wrote:Hi gaard,
it would be interesting if you test Dr. Deeb's Firebird 1.1, see here http://www.open-chess.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=541#p4876
In Dr. Deeb's list it is more than 100ELO better than all other engines. I have my doubts, but since the differences are so big it would be worth to test this engine.
-
gaard
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:39 am
- Real Name: Martin Wyngaarden
- Location: Holland, Michigan
Re: New Rating List
I took you up on your suggestion. Under my conditions it looks like it would rate very close to the default, which I tested a little while ago. It's only 265 games, but the chances of it topping Rybka or Houdini at this point are very slim.TPJR wrote:Hi gaard,
it would be interesting if you test Dr. Deeb's Firebird 1.1, see here http://www.open-chess.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=541#p4876
In Dr. Deeb's list it is more than 100ELO better than all other engines. I have my doubts, but since the differences are so big it would be worth to test this engine.
Code: Select all
Rank Name Elo + - games score oppo. draws
1 Houdini 1.03 139 18 18 1112 72% -23 36%
2 Rybka 4 126 18 18 1112 70% -21 33%
3 IvanHoe 9.57a 113 18 18 1080 69% -23 37%
4 FireBird 1.1 DD 99 37 37 265 69% -47 37%
5 Stockfish 1.8 66 18 18 1108 61% -15 34%
6 Naum 4.2 8 17 17 1108 52% -9 36%
7 Shredder 12 32-bit -48 18 18 1080 44% -6 32%
8 Critter 0.70 -60 18 18 1080 42% -4 32%
9 Spark 0.4 -124 18 18 1115 33% 6 29%
10 Zappa Mexico II -133 18 18 1115 31% 7 31%
11 Toga II 1.4beta5c -186 19 19 1155 24% 16 26%
Re: New Rating List
Thanks for the test.
-
gaard
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:39 am
- Real Name: Martin Wyngaarden
- Location: Holland, Michigan
Re: New Rating List
My pleasure. My curiosity had got the better of me too. Maybe when I find the spare CPU cycles I'll run a 1000+ game tournament.TPJR wrote:Thanks for the test.
In the meantime, I have added more games with IvanHoe 9.52a and Critter 0.80:
Code: Select all
Rank Name Elo + - games score oppo. draws
1 Houdini 1.03 134 18 18 1159 71% -21 36%
2 Rybka 4 128 18 18 1164 70% -19 33%
3 IvanHoe 9.52a 116 28 28 451 68% -16 36%
4 IvanHoe 9.57a 110 18 18 1080 69% -26 37%
5 Stockfish 1.8 62 17 17 1164 60% -13 34%
6 Naum 4.2 7 17 17 1165 52% -7 37%
7 Critter 0.80 6 48 48 144 53% -19 36%
8 Shredder 12 32-bit -50 18 18 1104 44% -5 32%
9 Critter 0.70 -62 18 18 1080 42% -7 32%
10 Spark 0.4 -125 18 18 1160 32% 6 30%
11 Zappa Mexico II -138 18 18 1160 30% 8 31%
12 Toga II 1.4beta5c -190 19 19 1159 24% 13 26%
Ho Ry Iv Iv St Na Cr Sh Cr Sp Za To
Houdini 1.03 70 86 97 99100 99100100100100100
Rybka 4 29 76 92 99100 99100100100100100
IvanHoe 9.52a 13 23 63 99 99 99100100100100100
IvanHoe 9.57a 2 7 36 99100 99100100100100100
Stockfish 1.8 0 0 0 0 99 98100100100100100
Naum 4.2 0 0 0 0 0 51 99 99100100100
Critter 0.80 0 0 0 0 1 48 98 99 99 99 99
Shredder 12 32-bit 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 84 99 99100
Critter 0.70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 99 99100
Spark 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 99
Zappa Mexico II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 99
Toga II 1.4beta5c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 Houdini 1.03 134 1159.0 (823.0 : 336.0)
120.0 ( 68.0 : 52.0) Rybka 4 128
58.0 ( 25.5 : 32.5) IvanHoe 9.52a 116
120.0 ( 62.0 : 58.0) IvanHoe 9.57a 110
120.0 ( 72.0 : 48.0) Stockfish 1.8 62
120.0 ( 89.5 : 30.5) Naum 4.2 7
21.0 ( 14.0 : 7.0) Critter 0.80 6
120.0 ( 92.0 : 28.0) Shredder 12 32-bit -50
120.0 ( 94.0 : 26.0) Critter 0.70 -62
120.0 (100.0 : 20.0) Spark 0.4 -125
120.0 (102.0 : 18.0) Zappa Mexico II -138
120.0 (104.0 : 16.0) Toga II 1.4beta5c -190
2 Rybka 4 128 1164.0 (811.0 : 353.0)
120.0 ( 52.0 : 68.0) Houdini 1.03 134
64.0 ( 36.0 : 28.0) IvanHoe 9.52a 116
120.0 ( 62.5 : 57.5) IvanHoe 9.57a 110
120.0 ( 72.0 : 48.0) Stockfish 1.8 62
120.0 ( 86.5 : 33.5) Naum 4.2 7
20.0 ( 15.5 : 4.5) Critter 0.80 6
120.0 ( 86.0 : 34.0) Shredder 12 32-bit -50
120.0 ( 90.0 : 30.0) Critter 0.70 -62
120.0 (100.5 : 19.5) Spark 0.4 -125
120.0 (100.5 : 19.5) Zappa Mexico II -138
120.0 (109.5 : 10.5) Toga II 1.4beta5c -190
3 IvanHoe 9.52a 116 451.0 (305.0 : 146.0)
58.0 ( 32.5 : 25.5) Houdini 1.03 134
64.0 ( 28.0 : 36.0) Rybka 4 128
64.0 ( 38.0 : 26.0) Stockfish 1.8 62
65.0 ( 43.5 : 21.5) Naum 4.2 7
24.0 ( 17.0 : 7.0) Shredder 12 32-bit -50
59.0 ( 45.5 : 13.5) Spark 0.4 -125
59.0 ( 49.5 : 9.5) Zappa Mexico II -138
58.0 ( 51.0 : 7.0) Toga II 1.4beta5c -190
4 IvanHoe 9.57a 110 1080.0 (741.0 : 339.0)
120.0 ( 58.0 : 62.0) Houdini 1.03 134
120.0 ( 57.5 : 62.5) Rybka 4 128
120.0 ( 69.5 : 50.5) Stockfish 1.8 62
120.0 ( 73.0 : 47.0) Naum 4.2 7
120.0 ( 91.5 : 28.5) Shredder 12 32-bit -50
120.0 ( 96.0 : 24.0) Critter 0.70 -62
120.0 ( 98.0 : 22.0) Spark 0.4 -125
120.0 ( 97.0 : 23.0) Zappa Mexico II -138
120.0 (100.5 : 19.5) Toga II 1.4beta5c -190
5 Stockfish 1.8 62 1164.0 (698.0 : 466.0)
120.0 ( 48.0 : 72.0) Houdini 1.03 134
120.0 ( 48.0 : 72.0) Rybka 4 128
64.0 ( 26.0 : 38.0) IvanHoe 9.52a 116
120.0 ( 50.5 : 69.5) IvanHoe 9.57a 110
120.0 ( 68.5 : 51.5) Naum 4.2 7
20.0 ( 12.0 : 8.0) Critter 0.80 6
120.0 ( 74.0 : 46.0) Shredder 12 32-bit -50
120.0 ( 84.5 : 35.5) Critter 0.70 -62
120.0 ( 93.5 : 26.5) Spark 0.4 -125
120.0 ( 91.0 : 29.0) Zappa Mexico II -138
120.0 (102.0 : 18.0) Toga II 1.4beta5c -190
6 Naum 4.2 7 1165.0 (602.0 : 563.0)
120.0 ( 30.5 : 89.5) Houdini 1.03 134
120.0 ( 33.5 : 86.5) Rybka 4 128
65.0 ( 21.5 : 43.5) IvanHoe 9.52a 116
120.0 ( 47.0 : 73.0) IvanHoe 9.57a 110
120.0 ( 51.5 : 68.5) Stockfish 1.8 62
20.0 ( 8.5 : 11.5) Critter 0.80 6
120.0 ( 73.0 : 47.0) Shredder 12 32-bit -50
120.0 ( 74.5 : 45.5) Critter 0.70 -62
120.0 ( 82.0 : 38.0) Spark 0.4 -125
120.0 ( 88.0 : 32.0) Zappa Mexico II -138
120.0 ( 92.0 : 28.0) Toga II 1.4beta5c -190
7 Critter 0.80 6 144.0 ( 77.0 : 67.0)
21.0 ( 7.0 : 14.0) Houdini 1.03 134
20.0 ( 4.5 : 15.5) Rybka 4 128
20.0 ( 8.0 : 12.0) Stockfish 1.8 62
20.0 ( 11.5 : 8.5) Naum 4.2 7
21.0 ( 14.5 : 6.5) Spark 0.4 -125
21.0 ( 14.5 : 6.5) Zappa Mexico II -138
21.0 ( 17.0 : 4.0) Toga II 1.4beta5c -190
8 Shredder 12 32-bit -50 1104.0 (481.5 : 622.5)
120.0 ( 28.0 : 92.0) Houdini 1.03 134
120.0 ( 34.0 : 86.0) Rybka 4 128
24.0 ( 7.0 : 17.0) IvanHoe 9.52a 116
120.0 ( 28.5 : 91.5) IvanHoe 9.57a 110
120.0 ( 46.0 : 74.0) Stockfish 1.8 62
120.0 ( 47.0 : 73.0) Naum 4.2 7
120.0 ( 62.0 : 58.0) Critter 0.70 -62
120.0 ( 67.0 : 53.0) Spark 0.4 -125
120.0 ( 76.0 : 44.0) Zappa Mexico II -138
120.0 ( 86.0 : 34.0) Toga II 1.4beta5c -190
9 Critter 0.70 -62 1080.0 (452.5 : 627.5)
120.0 ( 26.0 : 94.0) Houdini 1.03 134
120.0 ( 30.0 : 90.0) Rybka 4 128
120.0 ( 24.0 : 96.0) IvanHoe 9.57a 110
120.0 ( 35.5 : 84.5) Stockfish 1.8 62
120.0 ( 45.5 : 74.5) Naum 4.2 7
120.0 ( 58.0 : 62.0) Shredder 12 32-bit -50
120.0 ( 71.5 : 48.5) Spark 0.4 -125
120.0 ( 76.5 : 43.5) Zappa Mexico II -138
120.0 ( 85.5 : 34.5) Toga II 1.4beta5c -190
10 Spark 0.4 -125 1160.0 (376.5 : 783.5)
120.0 ( 20.0 : 100.0) Houdini 1.03 134
120.0 ( 19.5 : 100.5) Rybka 4 128
59.0 ( 13.5 : 45.5) IvanHoe 9.52a 116
120.0 ( 22.0 : 98.0) IvanHoe 9.57a 110
120.0 ( 26.5 : 93.5) Stockfish 1.8 62
120.0 ( 38.0 : 82.0) Naum 4.2 7
21.0 ( 6.5 : 14.5) Critter 0.80 6
120.0 ( 53.0 : 67.0) Shredder 12 32-bit -50
120.0 ( 48.5 : 71.5) Critter 0.70 -62
120.0 ( 56.5 : 63.5) Zappa Mexico II -138
120.0 ( 72.5 : 47.5) Toga II 1.4beta5c -190
11 Zappa Mexico II -138 1160.0 (352.0 : 808.0)
120.0 ( 18.0 : 102.0) Houdini 1.03 134
120.0 ( 19.5 : 100.5) Rybka 4 128
59.0 ( 9.5 : 49.5) IvanHoe 9.52a 116
120.0 ( 23.0 : 97.0) IvanHoe 9.57a 110
120.0 ( 29.0 : 91.0) Stockfish 1.8 62
120.0 ( 32.0 : 88.0) Naum 4.2 7
21.0 ( 6.5 : 14.5) Critter 0.80 6
120.0 ( 44.0 : 76.0) Shredder 12 32-bit -50
120.0 ( 43.5 : 76.5) Critter 0.70 -62
120.0 ( 63.5 : 56.5) Spark 0.4 -125
120.0 ( 63.5 : 56.5) Toga II 1.4beta5c -190
12 Toga II 1.4beta5c -190 1159.0 (275.5 : 883.5)
120.0 ( 16.0 : 104.0) Houdini 1.03 134
120.0 ( 10.5 : 109.5) Rybka 4 128
58.0 ( 7.0 : 51.0) IvanHoe 9.52a 116
120.0 ( 19.5 : 100.5) IvanHoe 9.57a 110
120.0 ( 18.0 : 102.0) Stockfish 1.8 62
120.0 ( 28.0 : 92.0) Naum 4.2 7
21.0 ( 4.0 : 17.0) Critter 0.80 6
120.0 ( 34.0 : 86.0) Shredder 12 32-bit -50
120.0 ( 34.5 : 85.5) Critter 0.70 -62
120.0 ( 47.5 : 72.5) Spark 0.4 -125
120.0 ( 56.5 : 63.5) Zappa Mexico II -138