Stockfish 4 PA_GTB

[echai]

64 DD Trabajando en Fritz 14
Muchísimas gracias.
Es recomendable seleccionar Persistent Hash?
Muchísimas gracias.

64 DD working in Fritz 14 thank you. It is recommended to select Persistent Hash? Thank you very much.

64 DD Being employed at Fritz 14 Muchísimas thank you. Is it advisable to select Persistent Hash? A lot of thank you.

64 DD Working in Fritz 14 Thank you very much. It is advisable to select Persistent Hash? Thank you very much.

Working in DD 64 14 Thank you Fritz. We recommend selecting Persistent Hash? Thank you.

[Jeremy Bernstein]

Sorry about your keyboard! I am still downloading the syzygy bases, so I haven't had a chance to experience them firsthand at this point -- µtorrent tells me I'll have them in a couple of weeks...

jb

[Jeremy Bernstein]

64 DD Trabajando en Fritz 14
Muchísimas gracias.
Es recomendable seleccionar Persistent Hash?
Muchísimas gracias.

64 DD working in Fritz 14 thank you. It is recommended to select Persistent Hash? Thank you very much.

64 DD Being employed at Fritz 14 Muchísimas thank you. Is it advisable to select Persistent Hash? A lot of thank you.

64 DD Working in Fritz 14 Thank you very much. It is advisable to select Persistent Hash? Thank you very much.

Working in DD 64 14 Thank you Fritz. We recommend selecting Persistent Hash? Thank you.

If you are using Stockfish PA_GTB for analysis, Persistent Hash is probably useful. It will probably slow the engine down too much for fast engine-engine play, though.

jb

[echai]

Muchísimas gracias, amigo Jeremy Bernstein.
Me he tomado la libertad de subir su versión en un foro latino.

A lot of thank you, friend Jeremy Bernstein. I have taken the freedom of raising his version in a Latin forum.

Thank you, friend Jeremy Bernstein. I have taken the liberty of uploading your version in a latino forum.

Thank you, friend Jeremy Bernstein. I've taken the liberty to upload your version in a Latin forum.

Thank you very much, friend Jeremy Bernstein. I have taken the freedom to upload your version at a latino Forum.

[Peter]

I hope that the new new new version works well for everyone now,
Jeremy

Thanks a lot for your fast and great work once again, Jeremy.
Everything's fine with Fritz14x64 GUI now here at my Intel Xeon.

[chri$]

i woul love for stockfish to start supporting Nalimov tb's.. the syzygy tb's only work for me using 3-4-5men.. when trying 6men i always get error engine caused exception near end of game always. or engine just stops playing..same issue using houdini 4 with 6 men syzygy.. everybody else seems to have no issues, but i am and i have every file needed for 6 men which is 366 files for 6menWDL folder and 366 files for 6menDTZ folder.

[echai]

Someone has tested the versions Stockfish PA GTB DD 64 SSE4.2 vs Stockfish Rockwood 031213 64 SSE4.2

[Jeremy Bernstein]

Someone has tested the versions Stockfish PA GTB DD 64 SSE4.2 vs Stockfish Rockwood 031213 64 SSE4.2

and? what was the result?

jb

[echai]

Discúlpenme estaba preguntando. Faltaron los signos de interrogación.
Las pruebas que se han hecho con las versiones Rockwood 64 SSE4.2 y Stockfish 041213 64 SSE4.2 (Por defecto) dan como la mas fuerte a la versión por defecto.

Excuse was wondering. They missed the question marks. The tests were made with 64 Rockwood SSE4.2 and SSE4.2 Stockfish 041213 64 (default) versions give stronger as the default version.

Forgive me he was asking. The signs of interrogation were absent. The tests that have done with the versions Rockwood 64 SSE4.2 and Stockfish 041213 64 SSE4.2 (For shortcoming) give like the strongest to the version for shortcoming.

I am sorry I was asking. There was no shortage of question marks. The tests that have been done with the versions Rockwood 64 SSE4.2 and Stockfish 041213 64 SSE4.2 (by default) dan as the stronger to the version by default.

I'm sorry was asking. Missed the question marks. Give proofs that have been made with versions Rockwood 64 SSE4.2 and Stockfish 041213 64 SSE4.2 (default) as the more strong to the default version.

[Jeremy Bernstein]

Discúlpenme estaba preguntando. Faltaron los signos de interrogación.
Las pruebas que se han hecho con las versiones Rockwood 64 SSE4.2 y Stockfish 041213 64 SSE4.2 (Por defecto) dan como la mas fuerte a la versión por defecto.

I'm sorry was asking. Missed the question marks. Give proofs that have been made with versions Rockwood 64 SSE4.2 and Stockfish 041213 64 SSE4.2 (default) as the more strong to the default version.

No one ever claimed that PA_GTB is stronger than the release version, just that it's more useful for analysis. If it's stronger, it's by accident or by virtue of tablebase probing in certain positions. But it shouldn't be much, if at all, weaker, either.

jb