SedatChess

[Homayoun]

SCCT Duel - CorChess vs SF-PB is ended:
About +7 Elo (in favor for SF-PB 160823)

The Winner: SF PB - Congrats to Skynet, SF team!

Code: Select all

1   SF-PB 160823     +11/-5/=294 50.97%  158.0/310
2   Corchess 140823  +5/-11/=294 49.03%  152.0/310

The Overall Draw-Ratio (based on 310 games): 95%

GAMES:
https://mega.nz/file/OpxS1a4A#T_CAhwxYR ... SHNpWoz6Zs

More Details,
It's clear that the overall draw ratio is increased!
Actually nothing strange...reason, SF team seems to
Be working on optimizing over Evalfiles, plus since
Unique 170623 suite is publicly available so I assume
That is easier vs current opening lines (to be tuned)
E.g as reference/evidence, when current openings were
As private..then the overall draws were about 85%-90%
E.g now, as we see the overall draws are close to 95%
I mean, Unique openings are became drawish as Balsa!
Btw, I have to keep next newer Unique ver as private)
If nothing else,
We'll see more fun for sure...at least for my side!

As final words, it's clear also that:
Mostly of SF-PB vers perform not bad via SCCT conditions!)


Best,
Sedat

Thanks. Interesting as always. It seems that SFpb is very stable like stockfish itself. Not only this test, all of the tests that I have studied, show this fact.

[Sedat Canbaz]

Thanks. Interesting as always. It seems that SFpb is very stable like stockfish itself. Not only this test, all of the tests that I have studied, show this fact.

Not at all.. and agreed )

So once more proved its tittle that
In case of non-learning engines:
SF-PB is SF-PB, reality is reality!

Greetings

[Sedat Canbaz]

Hello there )

I'm pleased to announce, I managed to organize new match:
SCCT Duel - Patzer AI 220823 AVX2 Vs TACTICAL 220823 AVX2

1st of all,
Thanks to both Authors..otherwise this Duel would not exist!

Note also that,
The current idea is born after checking the played results:
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=3494&start=40

To be more clear,
Sure, my used test conditions are different than OrgZ member
So and as we know, depending on cond. the results may vary..
As other influence is played: our used openings are not same!
And if determining real strength: playing more games better!

The Winner: TACTICAL - My Congratulations to Anton Ces!

Code: Select all

Standings via ChessBase:                     
1   TACTICAL 220823   +36/-31/=571 50.39%  321.5/638
2   Patzer AI 220823  +31/-36/=571 49.61%  316.5/638

Standings via CuteChess:  
Score of TACTICAL 220823 vs Patzer AI 220823: 36 - 31 - 571 [0.504]
...      TACTICAL 220823 playing White: 33 - 5 - 281  [0.544] 319
...      TACTICAL 220823 playing Black: 3 - 26 - 290  [0.464] 319
...      White vs Black: 59 - 8 - 571  [0.540] 638
Elo difference: 2.7 +/- 8.7, LOS: 72.9 %, DrawRatio: 89.5 %
638 of 638 games finished.

GAMES:
https://mega.nz/file/v54DgThZ#LVDN5Sbda ... Bxq78_1cBg

Conditions:
2x Epyc 7B12, HT+LP OFF, CuteChess, 1 Core, Ponder OFF, 1m+1s, 128 MB Hash, 4-MEN
A private Unique opening suite version is used, played each opening line as twice
Note also that all the current matches are played via GUI's concurrent option: 64

Best,
Sedat

[Homayoun]

Many thanks

[Anton101]

Mr. Sedat, thank you very much for the test. I am very interested in that suite with which this duel has worked. As soon as you release this suite I will use it to measure the progress of the four engines with which I update (two public and two private engines).

Best regards for you and OrgZ.

[OrgZ]

Hello there )

I'm pleased to announce, I managed to organize new match:
SCCT Duel - Patzer AI 220823 AVX2 Vs TACTICAL 220823 AVX2

1st of all,
Thanks to both Authors..otherwise this Duel would not exist!

Note also that,
The current idea is born after checking the played results:
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=3494&start=40

To be more clear,
Sure, my used test conditions are different than OrgZ member
So and as we know, depending on cond. the results may vary..
As other influence is played: our used openings are not same!
And if determining real strength: playing more games better!

The Winner: TACTICAL - My Congratulations to Anton Ces!

Code: Select all

Standings via ChessBase:                     
1   TACTICAL 220823   +36/-31/=571 50.39%  321.5/638
2   Patzer AI 220823  +31/-36/=571 49.61%  316.5/638

Standings via CuteChess:  
Score of TACTICAL 220823 vs Patzer AI 220823: 36 - 31 - 571 [0.504]
...      TACTICAL 220823 playing White: 33 - 5 - 281  [0.544] 319
...      TACTICAL 220823 playing Black: 3 - 26 - 290  [0.464] 319
...      White vs Black: 59 - 8 - 571  [0.540] 638
Elo difference: 2.7 +/- 8.7, LOS: 72.9 %, DrawRatio: 89.5 %
638 of 638 games finished.

GAMES:
https://mega.nz/file/v54DgThZ#LVDN5Sbda ... Bxq78_1cBg

Conditions:
2x Epyc 7B12, HT+LP OFF, CuteChess, 1 Core, Ponder OFF, 1m+1s, 128 MB Hash, 4-MEN
A private Unique opening suite version is used, played each opening line as twice
Note also that all the current matches are played via GUI's concurrent option: 64

Best,
Sedat

Marvelous.
Thank you for the test Mr Sedat. Congratulations Anton. The engine that gives my engines problems Tactical .Anton, Thanks mate

[Anton101]

Best regards dear OrgZ.

[Sedat Canbaz]

Many thanks

Not at all Mr. Homayoun)

[Sedat Canbaz]

Mr. Sedat, thank you very much for the test. I am very interested in that suite with which this duel has worked. As soon as you release this suite I will use it to measure the progress of the four engines with which I update (two public and two private engines).

Best regards for you and OrgZ.

Mr Anton,

You are welcome

I do not know...but as usual,
Your engines are doing not bad in my competitions!
Someone have to STOP YOU !! that's TOO MUCH !)

You may know,
When from same author's engine/book is as usual a winner..
Then I'm in pressure) that may call it as CHEATING ))
Because some already said so...but what I can do...?
If your engines are winning...this is not my problem!

About the private Unique opening suite,
Don't worry.. it's almost same as the public one..
Just added a few newer openings...
So it's still not ready to be released...

Greetings )

[Anton101]

Hi!

There is no trap or secret, I have learned from Mr. MZ and I read a lot on Discord.

Best regards!