Goodbye uncensored Open-Chess forum !

[botunnet]

Here are some information to add value to this topic :

...you are joking...

No risk, joking is no longer an activity here.

Grzegorz was banned because he shares Chris' ideas.
I was temporarily banned because I share an IP address with Chris.
Chris has received two warnings for his entire work showing evidence.

Sedat has received no warnings despite his multiple moderated posts and insults :
https:// open-chess.org/viewtopic.php?p=40641#p40641
https:// open-chess.org/viewtopic.php?p=27987#p27987
https:// open-chess.org/viewtopic.php?p=27989#p27989
https:// open-chess.org/viewtopic.php?p=27993#p27993
https:// open-chess.org/viewtopic.php?p=27997#p27997
https:// open-chess.org/viewtopic.php?p=28000#p28000

Outskirt is one of the must censored Forums of your list.

Chris posted the same data and showed the same evidence at Outskirts, and they are still visible.
The same cannot be said here.

...If this Forum is so censored how you still keeping posting here ?...

To highlight the censorship of this forum !
All members keep a copy of their posts, so every time they disappear from this forum, chess community have further proof that this forum is censored. Very useful for guiding actual and future members of the chess community.

...It also seems you have a strong confusion...

If there is confusion, it is certainly less serious than the confusion of the censorship of this forum.

I keep a copy of this post.

[supernova]

Here are some information to add value to this topic :

...you are joking...

No risk, joking is no longer an activity here.

Grzegorz was banned because he shares Chris' ideas.
I was temporarily banned because I share an IP address with Chris.
Chris has received two warnings for his entire work showing evidence.

Sedat has received no warnings despite his multiple moderated posts and insults :
https:// open-chess.org/viewtopic.php?p=40641#p40641
https:// open-chess.org/viewtopic.php?p=27987#p27987
https:// open-chess.org/viewtopic.php?p=27989#p27989
https:// open-chess.org/viewtopic.php?p=27993#p27993
https:// open-chess.org/viewtopic.php?p=27997#p27997
https:// open-chess.org/viewtopic.php?p=28000#p28000

Outskirt is one of the must censored Forums of your list.

Chris posted the same data and showed the same evidence at Outskirts, and they are still visible.
The same cannot be said here.

...If this Forum is so censored how you still keeping posting here ?...

To highlight the censorship of this forum !
All members keep a copy of their posts, so every time they disappear from this forum, chess community have further proof that this forum is censored. Very useful for guiding actual and future members of the chess community.

...It also seems you have a strong confusion...

If there is confusion, it is certainly less serious than the confusion of the censorship of this forum.

I keep a copy of this post.

Your writing style echoes Monsieur Deeds. All those topics have been moderated; not sure to follow your list, besides you put intentionally a space between the https:// and thr urls. I still wonder how it is so censored this Forum, you are still going on.

The data was mixed in a personal dispute against other member and you were part of that dispute too, very similar practise to your original Monsieur Deeds.

I followed the rules and the conventions. I moved all the incendiary, flaming topics for the implied members. Same modus operandis, long topics, zillions of screenshots, zillions of big fonts.

On the contrary, your confusion as your original one is your worst issue.

Not sure what you are talking about.

[botunnet]

------------

Notice:

Greeetings, Member "botunnet"

This post in this topic has been reviewed and edited because it violated the OpenChess Forum Rules. This is a gentle reminder not to continue flaming this topic or others in the Forum. Further recurrent violations will not be tolerated.

This is the last call from more virulents attacks to other members. You do not seem to understand the difference between post your content and then flame and offend people,

Thanks,

Best regards, Moderation.
------------

...you put intentionally a space between the https:// and thr urls...

Yes because like all the member who has been active on this forum for a long time, i know about this :

...I still wonder how it is so censored this Forum, you are still going on.

Already answered in my previous post.

zillions of screenshots, zillions of big fonts.

This seems logical since these screenshots proved zillions of lies (see topic : "When a TD lies to people...") and zillions of insults (see topic : "Personal attacks...").

[botunnet]

------------

Notice:

Greeetings, Member "botunnet"

This post in this topic has been reviewed and edited because it violated the OpenChess Forum Rules. This is a gentle reminder not to continue flaming this topic or others in the Forum. Further recurrent violations will not be tolerated.

This is the last call from more virulents attacks to other members. You do not seem to understand the difference between post your content and then flame and offend people,

Thanks,

Best regards, Moderation.

------------

Here are some information to add value to this topic :

...The data was mixed in a personal dispute against other member and you were part of that dispute too...

- Sedat renamed Khalid's EXP file and degraded Marco's engine performance (stockfishmz) with foreign data (eman's data).
Chris exposed the deception by publicly revealing the true origin of the EXP file renamed by Sedat.
Sedat took it personally and degraded Khalid's engine performance (eman) with an Alex's EXP file (merged data) in order to fuel the dispute.

- For years, Sedat has been degrading the accuracy of EXP files using concurrency > 1 or "experience multipv" or "experience book false".
Sedat has insulted everyone who has dared to discuss with him (DeeDs, IbaiBur, Rulleeeee, Amos4ever, Sarona, me, etc.).

- Chris trains his Depth4 EXP files from different opening lists and shares the Eman's training games
These Eman's training games also contain the moves from the trained openings + all the blunders tried by Eman in order to learn which lines are the most efficient for each trained opening.
From these Eman's training games, Sedat created BIN books and renamed them to "Depth4_DeeDs" or "Depth4 2025".
Sedat tested these BIN books from the starting position and cumulated their losses in order to artificially inflate the results.
Chris publicly exposed the deception by revealing the moves played by the Sedat's Depth4 BIN books that are not part of the Chris's Depth4 EXP files.

[botunnet]

...Sedat renamed Khalid's EXP file and degraded Marco's engine performance (stockfishmz) with foreign data (eman's data)...

...But often I've difficulties to remember all..

Here are some information to add value to this topic :

24 MAY 2022

[Sedat Canbaz]

------------

Notice:

Greeetings, Member "Sedat Canbaz"

Moderation will check every message and resolution can take a few days.

Thanks,

Best regards, Moderation.
------------

Please refrain from referencing personal disputes.

Thanks in advance

And just in case...if still you will blame Me and attack Me as before,

[Sedat Canbaz]

@ botunnet

1st of all,
Hey man, take it easy..why are you so much affected?
You're not author of the played engines, books, exp!
And not today or yesterday, 3 years ago Duel I played,
In same time, all we noticed here that plus on Prodeo
Forum, actually you still fuel the dispute...NOT Me!
And too meaningless, to talk same boring story over!
Really sorry to say that but this is madness to talk
Still for so old news..such as belonging to 2022 year (

2nd
This is SCCT rules, and as TD, I'm free to run at
Any conditions..and you're free to like it or not,
No problem from side..in that case, I suggest to
Check NON-SCCT results...very simple, right?

3rd
Furthermore, considering the situation,
I don't have to answer you, since you're
Not real author/s if I'm missing, correct Me..
But anyhow, you can visit SedatChess site,
You can check 'Some Notes on Deeds' thread,
Where you'll find a lot of NEWER details over..
Just in case... Happy Reading )

As last,
I preferred Depth4 to be created and tested due
On Deeds PC was Winner vs almost all...at least
I remember so..if I am wrong, please correct Me..
In other words, I was wondering regarding what
Will be the performance under SCCT conditions.

And as I stated many times..in case of failure,
I may repeat....but only in case of real authors
But a small note: under preferred SCCT rules!
You may know, Rule is Rule..as everywhere, at
least is followed in serious places, platforms!
Hope helps..

Sure for more info, please don't hesitate to ask,
But if possible to be non related over old years...
Thank you!

Btw, about your rest blaming comments,
What are you talking about? Besides again too old news..move on sir!
Anyhow, not true.. the attacks, ban etc started by MZ, others plus by you!
In short, as nature rules, I've just replayed... as it should be...!!

And after all,
I'm only human, not robot, I've feelings...hope helps too )

[botunnet]

Reminder for Sedat :

This is the last message on this thread. Consider that this one is closed. No more flooding that does not bring value.

No new information has been provided by Sedat.
Several of Sedat's posts have been edited because they violated Open-Chess rules.
Some members got 2 warnings without ban, some get temporary ban without a warning.
Sedat still got no warnings or temporary bans for exactly the same number of violations of the rules of OpenChess.

The lack of sanctions against Sedat demonstrates the blindness of the censorship of this forum.